Pre-award proposal submission

The role and responsibilities of principal investigators and research support team for preparing an award proposal for submission.

All grant proposals to external (outside of Ohio State) sponsors are to be submitted through the research support team unless other arrangements have been approved (e.g., another arrangement has been documented in a memorandum of understanding signed by the dean). Proposals to internal opportunities do not require submission through the CPH research support team or Ohio State's Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP), however, the principal investigator (PI) can opt to ask their grants manager on the CPH research support team for assistance with the submission. Even if the PI decides to submit an internal proposal without their grants manager's assistance, the PI still notifies their grants manager of any internal proposals and any resulting awards, to ensure that they are included in our college metrics and communication materials.

The PI ensures that the research support team is engaged in all externally-funded proposals that meet any of these criteria:

  1. Funded by federal dollars (direct and/or passthrough)
  2. Require the use of university regulatory boards or panels (IRB, IACUC, HIPAA Privacy Board, Export Control, etc.)
  3. Have documented cost share
  4. Have subcontracts
  5. Are likely for the proposed work to produce publishable research and/or new knowledge or inventions, or
  6. Contain a technology access fee (TAG) as part of the budget

Notification of intent to submit a proposal 

The research support team maintains a proposal worklist to track all proposals (external and internal, lead and subawards) led by college PIs. The PI notifies their grants manager as soon as they begin to consider submitting as the lead for a proposal (Table 1) or for a subaward (Table 2). It is better to provide early notification rather than delay in notifying, even if the plans for submission are not certain. The PI provides the funding opportunity announcement (e.g., request for applications or program announcement) with the notification. Occasionally, funding opportunity announcements are released with short lead times and the decision to submit a proposal is made close to a deadline. The research support team will do their best to accommodate these, however, late notifications may result in the inability to accommodate the proposal submission and may require its delay until the next standard due date. If there is not another standard due date, the team will try to accommodate the proposal but cannot guarantee this.

The timeline strikes a balance between flexibility for the PI and sufficient time for the grants manager and Office of Sponsored Programs sponsored program officers (SPOs) to ensure quality review and submission. The director of Research Support will consider requests for exceptions to the timelines on a case-by-case basis by assessing the team’s workload and whether the proposal can be accommodated without jeopardizing other proposals in the worklist that have followed the timeline deadlines. Among the exceptions to the timeline, submissions from untenured faculty and those responding to new funding opportunity announcements that did not provide six weeks of lead time will be prioritized over others.

Tables

Back to top